Science Source
Xuebin Zhang, Hui Wan, Francis W. Zwiers, Gabriele C. Hegerl, Seung‐Ki Min
Geophysical Research Letters
Published date October 9, 2013
Geophysical Research Letters
Published date October 9, 2013
Attributing intensification of precipitation extremes to human influence
- Provides estimates of the human contribution to the observed widespread intensification of precipitation extremes
- Considers the annual maxima of daily (RX1day) and 5 day consecutive (RX5day) precipitation amounts over the Northern Hemisphere land area for 1951–2005
- Compares observed changes with expected responses to external forcings as simulated by multiple coupled climate models participating in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5
- Detects the effect of anthropogenic forcings in extreme precipitation observations, both individually and when simultaneously estimating anthropogenic and naturally forced changes
- Finds that the effect of natural forcings is not detectable
- Estimates that human influence has intensified annual maximum 1 day precipitation in sampled Northern Hemisphere locations by 3.3% [1.1% to 5.8%, >90% confidence interval] on average
- Concludes that this corresponds to an average intensification in RX1day of 5.2% [1.3%, 9.3%] per degree increase in observed global mean surface temperature consistent with the Clausius‐Clapeyron relationship
Related Content
Science Source
| Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
EEE 2018: Anthropogenic Impacts on the Exceptional Precipitation of 2018 in the Mid-Atlantic
Headline

Nov 12, 2019 | Ellicott City, MD Patch
Ellicott City Residents Say Flood Mitigation Plan Failed
Headline

Jun 1, 2018 | NOAA Climate.gov
Torrential rains bring epic flash floods in Maryland in late May 2018
Headline

May 30, 2018 | Slate Magazine
The Maryland Flooding Is a Warning: The Danger Is Rain, and We’re Making It Worse